Predicting Psychiatric Disorder from the Classified Psychiatric Characteristics using Machine Learning Algorithm



Abstract Views
243

Downloads
195

Citations

Share

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.sidebar##

Submitted Jul 15, 2022
Published Aug 29, 2022
10.24018/compute.2022.2.4.72

Abstract viewed = 243 times

Table of Contents

##plugins.themes.bootstrap3.article.main##

Psychiatry is an interdisciplinary field that focuses on a major public health concern. The following threats represent a significant risk to the mental health of anyone who is exposed to them. Various things might have an impact on both a person's physical and financial health. Psychiatric treatment can raise the likelihood of getting a mental disorder. Schizophrenia is a devastating mental condition that predominantly affects women. It is more prevalent in both male and female. Mentally sick individuals are more likely to engage in antisocial behavior which results in social behavioral distortion. As a direct result, societal concerns that were already evident have grown considerably more prevalent. According to global data, anxiety, drugs misuse, hazardous behavior, arrogance, suicidal thoughts, depression, disorientation, and consciousness are widespread among 20 to 30 years adults. These individuals are continuously searching for something new, which can be detrimental to their mental health because it makes them less stable. 

A machine learning classifier has been predicted to classify the appropriate extracted features after applying Support Vector Machine (SVM) classifiers for various no-linear kernels, taking into account all the critical elements for psychiatry that have been stated. An unequal history of mental diseases has climbed from 10.5 percent in 1990 to 19.86 percent in 2022, according to Adult Prevalence of Mental Illness (AMI) 2022, and psychiatry currently accounts for 14.3 percent of yearly global mortality (approximately 8 million).

Keywords: Performance Analysis & Prediction, psychiatry, result comparison, SVM

References

  1. Walsh-Messinger J, Jiang H, Lee H, Rothman K, Ahn H, Malaspina D. Relative importance of symptoms, cognition, and other multilevel variables for psychiatric disease classifications by machine learning. J Psy Res. 2019; 278: 27-34.
     Google Scholar
  2. Spitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Löwe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arc Int Med. 2006; 166(10): 1092-1097.
     Google Scholar
  3. French MT, Roebuck MC, McGeary KA, Chitwood DD, McCoy CB. Using the drug abuse screening test (DAST-10) to analyze health services utilization and cost for substance users in a community-based setting. Sub Use Mis. 2001; 36(6-7): 927-43.
     Google Scholar
  4. Cowan N, Adams EJ, Bhangal S, Corcoran M, Decker R, Dockter CE, et al. Foundations of arrogance: A broad survey and framework for research. Rev Gen Psy. 2019; 23(4): 425-43.
     Google Scholar
  5. Epstein‐Lubow G, Gaudiano BA, Hinckley M, Salloway S, Miller IW. Evidence for the validity of the American medical association's caregiver self‐assessment questionnaire as a screening measure for depression. Am J Ger Soc. 2010; 58(2): 387-388.
     Google Scholar
  6. Vink P, Tulek Z, Gillis K, Jönsson AC, Buhagiar J, Waterhouse C, et al. Consciousness assessment: A questionnaire of current neuroscience nursing practice in Europe. J Clin Nurs. 2018; 27(21-22): 3913-9.
     Google Scholar
  7. Bran A, Vaidis DC. Assessing risk-taking: what to measure and how to measure it. J Risk Res. 2020; 23(4): 490-503.
     Google Scholar
  8. Johnson MH. Assessing confused patients. J N N Psy. 2001; 71(suppl 1): i7-12.
     Google Scholar
  9. Gad MM. Classification of mental tasks using support vector machine based on linear predictive coding and new mother wavelet transform. International Conference on Biomedical Engineering and Computational Technologies (SIBIRCON). 2015: 156-159.
     Google Scholar
  10. Ritter S, Barrett DG, Santoro A, Botvinick MM. Cognitive psychology for deep neural networks: A shape bias case study. International Conference on Machine Learning. 2017: 2940-2949.
     Google Scholar
  11. Ben-Hur A, Ong CS, Sonnenburg S, Schölkopf B, Rätsch G. Support vector machines and kernels for computational biology. PLoS Com Bio. 2008; 4(10): e1000173.
     Google Scholar
  12. Hsu CW, Lin CJ. A comparison of methods for multiclass support vector machines. IEEE transactions NN. 2002; 13(2): 415-25.
     Google Scholar
  13. Mayoraz E, Alpaydin E. Support vector machines for multi-class classification. International Work-Conference on AN. 1999: 833-842.
     Google Scholar
  14. Yaman S, Pelecanos J. Using polynomial kernel support vector machines for speaker verification. IEEE Sig Proc Letters. 2013; 20(9): 901-904.
     Google Scholar
  15. Han S, Qubo C, Meng H. Parameter selection in SVM with RBF kernel function. World Automation Congress, IEEE. 2012: 1-4.
     Google Scholar